The basis

[tkorrovi]

I have not written here a long time, neither are these few people who come here from time to time. Btw, by the lack of interest i mean that no one is interested to contribute to the development.

But i would describe the beginning of the derivation (of ADS), that maybe is not explained clearly enough in that written before, though it was written before.

At that point we have nothing, only some things that we know about consciousness. That it is very flexible and changeable, capable of solving very different problems and capable of solving completely novel problems, and at that it never really crashes due to exceptions or inconsistencies, it is always able to go ahead. And it is self-developing too, capable to develop based on itself. Try to make such thing, it would be profoundly different from all the conventional AI there is, none of which is capable of this. It may be said because of something essential that it always omits, thus being a greedy simplification.

So from that which we know, what conclusion can we make about that which we want to derive? It must be very changeable, to the greatest extent possible. What does it mean. It means that whatever can emerge as the result of development, as much as ever possible. Must be so, otherwise it were not changeable to the greatest extent.

Everything ever possible must be able to emerge, this means that whatever possible must be able to appear as a part of the self-developing system. So what should it be, a 3D? 3D can be implemented as a grid with say 4 connections from each node. Can everything appear in such implementation? No, the direct connections between the nodes not close to each other in the grid cannot appear. This means that it must look like a system, where every node can potentially be connected to every other node, not a grid.

So it must be a system, with connected nodes. Then again we proceed from the premise that it has to be extremely changeable. This means that it cannot be a static system, but a system where the structure of connections always changes. And because it is self-developing, the structure of connections should always change based on the previous structure of connections.

So we derived what it should be, and what it should look like. Proceeding only from the premise that it should be extremely changeable. This is the beginning of the derivation of ADS, that was perhaps not so clear, the rest is more straight-forward and easier to think.

I call that which runs ADS ("Absolutely Dynamic System") a virtual machine. Because i just cannot find another name. It's the primum mobile, everywhere and always present, that always implements the change of the connections. This process is by its nature massively simultaneous. This is inherent and fundamental, fundamental because that virtual machine is the only thing that always remains the same. Everything else is changing and consists of change.

Thank you for your attention, i hope that i explained it clearly enough, and that my effort has a value for you.

[tkorrovi]

I talked with some people about my post above. To find out what they think about it, and how my mind may differ from theirs. It appeared that some people have difficulty in understanding concepts like extremely changeable. They don't seem to think in so general way that i do. So i try to explain it.

In the Descartes wax experiment, wax is extremely changeable, because one can change it into any shape. Yet it is not changeable enough. In computer we can create structures that are more changeable than that. The question is what is the most changeable. Descartes in essence thought that changeability is the only property of wax that always remains, which means that it is fundamental.

About the extreme changeability of consciousness. Like in the music of Beethoven, he goes from one pattern to a completely different one, that seems to have nothing similar to the previous pattern, yet he does that in the way that seems completely natural.

The rest of the derivation is about how it can self-develop so that it can change in every way. But the post above is only about the beginning of the derivation, and it is about changeability.

[tkorrovi]

Having the conditions of changeability and self-development, what we get by derivation is something like Conway's Game of Life. But as Conway's Game of Life is restricted, so much so that it is not even able to interact with the environment, then we have to change the condition to extremely changeable.

It is up to this point that some people still agree. Yet it was important to explain the beginning of the derivation, and the very beginning of it is not controversial at all.

[cyankk]

Something, I want to note or ask that maybe we consider that while it's extremely changeable, an essential feature maybe of virtuosity, is we want it to very logical as well, the actual programming of the core of the system maybe Synergetics or perhaps you use other derivatives or equations, and the product of changeable and absolutely logical. So logical change can maybe be compared to Quantum Mechanics. Logical is a way of saying what we comment about musical scores of Beethoven, the music needs to be arranged only in one particular way that is sounds the way it should.

Perhaps this is the 2-factor authentication that we need, for the system to be usable, in this way that we want it to be usable. I am also noting that extremely changeable denotes maybe water, as some kind of fluid..